No one knows how much money Brahmastra made at the box office. The movie has cited a variety of figures from various sources. Many people may find these disparate figures puzzling, and they undoubtedly cast some uncertainties. Kangana Ranaut thinks the producers are "faking" the statistics.
The actual cause is not as evil. The box office receipts for movies are determined in a variety of ways both in India and the West, yielding varying earnings for the same movie. Are Brahmastra box office collection fake? Here's what we know so far.
Here's an explanation of why that is the case as well as how much money Brahmastra has made. Ranbir Kapoor, Alia Bhatt, and Mouni Roy star in Ayan Mukerji's film Brahmastra, which also features lengthy cameos by Amitabh Bachchan, Nagarjuna, and Shah Rukh Khan. On September 9, the movie in Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, Kannad, and Malayalam was released in theatres. It has performed successfully in Telugu hotspots, the Hindi heartland, the US, Australia, and New Zealand. This combination of nationalities and languages has made gathering data for Brahmastra quite difficult.
Kangana Ranaut questioned why Karan Johar shared the gross receipts of the movie rather than the net receipts in her accusations against the producer of Brahmastra. Who knows what the distinction is? Simply said, gross box office receipts relate to the sum of money earned from the movie's ticket sales. The number is always higher. Gross box office receipts are deducted from net receipts by the government for different taxes, such as service tax and entertainment tax.
The nett can vary from one state to another even with the same gross because these taxes vary from state to state. Distributor share, or just what it sounds like, the amount distributors receive, is the third component of the box office numbers. It is the gross collection less the theatre rental fee.
So how does this relate to the Brahmastra saga specifically? The movie has amassed gross receipts of ₹225 crores so far. The creators and even the distributors have not made this much money, according to this. Their portion is substantially smaller. It is not a discrepancy if any source reports a lower figure for global collection; it is highly feasible that the figure is for nett collections.
The film business is not a consistent, monolithic entity. Every region and nation operates in a unique manner. As a result, revenue is typically stated in Bollywood as net figures rather than gross figures, as it is in the US. South India typically publishes gross data, which further complicates matters. Thank goodness no one has yet resorted to reporting distributor shares, as it would provide a completely new issue. The biggest misunderstanding around Brahmastra's stats is a direct outcome of these various techniques. In Short, it depends on the type of collections that are being reported by various sources, whether they are nett or gross.